Types for Proofs and Programs

Thisbookcontainsaselectionofpaperspresentedatthesecondannualworkshop heldundertheauspicesoftheEspritWorkingGroup21900Types. Theworkshop tookplaceinIrsee,Germany,from27to31ofMarch1998andwasattendedby 89researchers. Ofthe25submissions,14wereselectedforpublicationafteraregularref- eeingprocess. The?nalchoicewasmadebytheeditors. Thisvolumeisasequeltotheproceedingsfromthe?rstworkshopofthe workinggroup,whichtookplaceinAussois,France,inDecember1996. The proceedingsappearedinvol. 1512oftheLNCSseries,editedbyChristinePaulin- MohringandEduardoGim´enez. Theseworkshopsare,inturn,acontinuationofthemeetingsorganizedin 1993,1994,and1995undertheauspicesoftheEspritBasicResearchAction 6453 Types for Proofs and Programs. Thoseproceedingswerealsopublished intheLNCSseries,editedbyHenkBarendregtandTobiasNipkow(vol. 806, 1993),byPeterDybjer,BengtNordstr¨omandJanSmith(vol. 996,1994)and byStefanoBerardiandMarioCoppo(vol. 1158,1995). TheEspritBRA6453 wasacontinuationoftheformerEspritAction3245Logical Frameworks: - sign,ImplementationandExperiments. Thearticlesfromtheannualworkshops organizedunderthatActionwereeditedbyGerardHuetandGordonPlotkin inthebooksLogical FrameworksandLogicalEnvironments,bothpublishedby CambridgeUniversityPress. Acknowledgments WewouldliketothankIrmgardMignaniandAgnesSzabo-Lackingerforhelping uswithprocessingtheregistrations,andRalphMatthesandMarkusWenzelfor organizationalsupportduringthemeeting. Weareindebtedtotheorganizersof theWorkingGroupTypesandalsotoPeterClote,TobiasNipkowandMartin Wirsingforgivingustheopportunitytoorganizethisworkshopandfortheir support. WewouldalsoliketoacknowledgefundingbytheEuropeanUnion. Thisvolumewouldnothavebeenpossiblewithouttheworkofthereferees. Theyarelistedonthenextpageandwethankthemfortheirinvaluablehelp. June1999 ThorstenAltenkirch WolfgangNaraschewski BernhardReus VI List of Referees PeterAczel PetriMa¨enp¨a¨a ThorstenAltenkirch RalphMatthes GillesBarthe MichaelMendler HenkBarendregt WolfgangNaraschewski UliBerger TobiasNipkow MarcBezem SaraNegri VenanzioCapretta ChristinePaulin-Mohring MarioCoppo HenrikPersson CatarinaCoquand RandyPollack RobertoDiCosmo DavidPym GillesDowek ChristopheRa?alli MarcDymetman AarneRanta Jean-ChristopheFilliˆatre BernhardReus NeilGhani EikeRitter MartinHofmann GiovanniSambin MonikaSeisenberger FurioHonsell AntonSetzer PaulJackson JanSmith FelixJoachimski FlorianKammuller ¨ SergeiSoloview JamesMcKinna MakotoTakeyama Sim˜aoMelodeSousa SilvioValentini ThomasKleymann MarkusWenzel HansLeiss BenjaminWerner Table of Contents OnRelatingTypeTheoriesandSetTheories. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 PeterAczel CommunicationModellingandContext-DependentInterpretation: AnIntegratedApproach. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 Ren´eAhn,TijnBorghuis Grobner ¨ BasesinTypeTheory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 ThierryCoquand,HenrikPersson AModalLambdaCalculuswithIterationandCaseConstructs. . . . . . . . . . 47 Jo¨elleDespeyroux,PierreLeleu ProofNormalizationModulo . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 GillesDowek,BenjaminWerner ProofofImperativeProgramsinTypeTheory. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78 Jean-ChristopheFilliˆatre AnInterpretationoftheFanTheoreminTypeTheory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93 DanielFridlender ConjunctiveTypesandSKInT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106 JeanGoubault-Larrecq ModularStructuresasDependentTypesinIsabelle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121 FlorianKammul ¨ler MetatheoryofVeri?cationCalculiinLEGO. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133 ThomasKleymann BoundedPolymorphismforExtensibleObjects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149 LuigiLiquori AboutE?ectiveQuotientsinConstructiveTypeTheory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 164 MariaEmiliaMaietti VIII AlgorithmsforEqualityandUni?cationinthePresenceof NotationalDe?nitions. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 179 FrankPfenning,CarstenSch¨urmann APreviewoftheBasicPicture:ANewPerspectiveonFormalTopology. . 194 GiovanniSambin,SilviaGebellato On Relating TypeTheories and Set Theories PeterAczel Departments of Mathematics and Computer Science Manchester University petera@cs. man. ac. uk Introduction 1 The original motivation for the work described in this paper was to det- minetheprooftheoreticstrengthofthetypetheoriesimplementedintheproof developmentsystemsLegoandCoq,[12,4]. Thesetypetheoriescombinetheim- 2 predicativetype of propositions , from the calculus of constructions,[5], with theinductivetypesandhierarchyoftypeuniversesofMartin-Lo¨f’sconstructive typetheory,[13]. Intuitivelythereisaneasywaytodetermineanupperbound ontheprooftheoreticstrength. Thisistousethe‘obvious’types-as-sets- terpretation of these type theories in a strong enough classical axiomatic set theory.