Hume on Is and Ought

Preface and Acknowledgements Notes on the Contributors Introduction; C.Pigden The Autonomy of Ethics; A.N. Prior Professor Prior and the Autonomy of Ethics; J.M.Shorter Hume's Own 'Ought' Conclusions; A.C.Baier Much Obliged; W.Robison Letter From A Gentleman in Dunedin to a Lady in the Country; A Gentleman Hume's Master Argument; A.Heathcote Heathcote's Hume; A.Musgrave On Heathcote Against Hume's Law; N.Y.S. Lo Comments on 'Hume's Master Argument'; C.Pigden Comments on 'Hume's Master Argument'; G.Schurz Reply to Criticisms; A.Heathcote In Defence of Hume's Law; G.Russell The Significance of Hume's Law; H.Salwén Snare's Puzzle/ Hume's Purpose: Non-Cogntivism and What Hume Was Really Up To With No-Ought-From-Is; C.Pigden Comments on Salwén And Pigden; N.Y.S.Lo Reply to Lo; C.Pigden Nontrivial Versions of Hume's Is-Ought Thesis; G.Schurz On The Triviality of Hume's Law: Reply to Gerhard Schurz; C.Pigden Reply to Pigden; G.Schurz Barriers to Implication; G.Restall & G.Russell Comments on 'Barriers to Implication'; P.Vranas Comments on Restall, Russell and Vranas; G.Schurz Supervenience and the Autonomy of Ethics: Yet another Way in Which Relevant Logic is Superior to Classical Logic; E.W.Mares Moral Conclusions from Nonmoral Premises; S.Maitzen Comments on 'Moral Conclusions from Nonmoral Premises'; G.Schurz Comments on 'Moral Conclusions from Nonmoral Premises'; C.Pigden Reply to Pigden and Schurz; S.Maitzen Consolidated Bibliography Index