International Law Reports

1. Case concerning the Vienna convention on consular relations (Paraguay v. United States of America) (Request for the Indication of Provisional Measures) [International Court of Justice] 9/4/98 (provisional measures) 10/11/98 (discontinuance order); 2. Breard v. Pruett; Breard v. Greene [United States of America] 20/1/98 (Ct Apps) 14/4/98 (Sup Ct); 3. LaGrand Case (Germany v. United States of America) (Request for the Indication of Provisional Measures) [International Court of Justice] 3/3/99; 4. Federal Republic of Germany v. United States and Others [United States of America]] 3/3/99; 5. Suárez Rosero v. Ecuador [Inter-American Court of Human Rights] 12/11/97 (merits) 20/1/99 (reparations); 6. Waite and Kennedy v. Germany (Application No 26083/94) [European Court of Human Rights] 18/2/99; 7. Järvinen v. Finland (Communication No 295/1988) [United Nations Human Rights Committee] 25/7/90; 8. Pauger v. Austria (Communication No 415/1990) [United Nations Human Rights Committee] 26/3/92; 9. Mojica v. Dominican Republic (Communication No 449/1991) [United Nations Human Rights Committee] 15/7/94; 10. Pepels v. Netherlands (Communication No 484/1991) [United Nations Human Rights Committee]; 11. Rodriguez v. Uruguay (Communication No 322/1988) [United Nations Human Rights Committee] 19/7/94; 12. Singer v. Canada (Communication No 455/1991) [United Nations Human Rights Committee] 26/7/94; 13. Simunek, Tuzilova and Prochazka v. Czech Republic (Communication No 516/1992) [United Nations Human Rights Committee] 19/7/95; 14. Andreu v. Colombia (Communication No 563/1993) [United Nations Human Rights Committee] 27/10/95; 15. Atkinson, Stroud and Cyr v. Canada (Communication No 573/1994) [United Nations Human Rights Committee] 31/10/95; 16. Julian and Drake v. New Zealand (Communication No 601/1994) [United Nations Human Rights Committee] 3/4/97; 17. Drobek v. Slovakia (Communication No 643/1995) [United Nations Human Rights Committee] 14/7/97; 18. Adu v. Canada (Communication No 654/1995) [United Nations Human Rights Committee] 18/7/97; 19. McLawrence v. Jamaica (Communication No 702/1996) [United Nations Human Rights Committee] 18/7/97; 20. Hopu and Bessert v. France (Communication No 549/1993) [United Nations Human Rights Committee] 29/7/97; 21. Vicente et al v. Colombia (Communication No 612/1995) [United Nations Human Rights Committee] 29/7/97; 22. Kubacz v. Shah [Australia] 21/11/83; 23. De Andrade v. de Andrade [Australia]18/6/84; 24. Clunies-Ross v. Commonwealth of Australia and Others [Australia] 25/10/84; 25. Coe (on behalf of the Wiradjuri Tribe) v. Commonwealth of Australia and Another [Australia] 23/12/93; 26. Lindon v. Commonwealth of Australia (No 2) [Australia] 6/5/96; 27. Thorpe v. Commonwealth of Australia (No 3) [Australia] 12/6/97; 28. Kruger v. Commonwealth of Australia; Bray v. Commonwealth of Australia [Australia] 31/7/97; 29. CSR Ltd v. CIGNA Insurance Australia Ltd and Others; CSR America Inc v. CIGNA Insurance Australia Ltd and Others [Australia] 5/8/97; 30. Agarwala v. Union of India [India] 31/7/80; 31. Gosalia v. Agarwal and Others [India] 26/8/81; 32. Chern Taong Shang and Another v. Baijal and Others [India] 13/1/88; 33. Charan Lal Sahu and Others v. Union of India [India] 22/12/89; 34. Carvalho v. Hull, Blyth (Angola) Ltd [England] 14/6/79; 35. Midland Bank Plc and Another v. Laker Airways Ltd and Others [England] 30/7/85; 36. Mansouri v. Singh [England] 12/2/86; 37. Kingdom of Spain v. Christie, Manson & Woods Ltd and Another [England] 21/3/86; 38. R v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Zia Mehmet Binbasi [England] 25/7/89; 39. An International Bank plc v. Republic of Zambia and Others [England] 23/5/97; 40. Attorney-General v. Mobil Oil NZ Ltd [New Zealand] 1/7/87; 41. S v. Ndhlovu [Rhodesia] 7/7/77.