

Alice Bosma is assistant professor at the department of Criminal Law, Tilburg University (the Netherlands).
Meer over Alice BosmaEmotive Justice
Laypersons' and legal professionals' evaluations of emotional victims within the just world paradigm
Samenvatting
Emotive Justice concerns reactions of laypersons and legal professionals to emotional victims of serious crime. Although we would expect victims to receive acknowledgment and support, even the most well-meaning individuals might react in ways that enhance rather than alleviate the suffering of victims, causing secondary victimization.
The Belief in a Just World Theory (BJW) is a suitable research framework to explain why people, motivated to behave as if the world is a just place where everyone gets what they deserve, react in either positive or negative ways when they get confronted with counter-evidence, such as the victimization of an innocent victim. However, BJW theory has up until now insufficiently focused on the observers’ normative evaluation of the injustice as well as the emotionality of the victim. Moreover, while negative reactions to victims are particularly harmful in institutional environments such as the criminal justice system, the theory has not sufficiently been applied in this context.
Exploring reactions to victims in different settings calls for innovative research methods adapted to the context. Both qualitative (Articulated Thoughts in Simulated Situations) and quantitative measures are employed to investigate how legal professionals (Dutch justice and prosecutors), tasked with managing the emotionality in the courtroom, as well as avoiding secondary victimization, differ from laypersons in their reactions to emotional victim narratives.
Specificaties
Inhoudsopgave
U kunt van deze inhoudsopgave een PDF downloaden
About the author XI
List of Publications XII
Samenvatting XV
1. Introduction 1
Aim: explore victim-oriented reactions by legal professionals 5
Aim: focus on emotional victims of crime 7
Aim: improve the measurement of strategies 8
Central research question and hypothesis 8
Research design and overview 9
PART I Theoretical framework 11
2. Belief in a just world: the state of the art 13
2.1 A framework of victim-oriented BJW strategies 15
2.2 The relative use of positive and negative strategies 18
2.3 Conceptualization of (in)justice 21
2.4 Conclusion 26
3. The emotional victim 29
3.1 The conventional BJW vignette 29
3.2 Advantages of the emotional victim vignette 31
3.3 Emotions influencing positive and negative strategies 35
3.4 Observers’ expectations about victims’ emotions 39
3.5 Conclusion 40
4. The emotional victim in the criminal justice context 43
4.1 Professional reactions towards victims 44
4.2 Re-emotionalization of law 46
4.3 The impact of emotions 49
4.4 Victim participation and the emotionality argument 54
4.5 Managing emotions related to victims’ narratives 57
4.6 Conclusion 60
5. Improving the measurement of strategies 63
5.1 Vignette technique 64
5.2 Improving questionnaires 66
5.3 Articulated Thoughts in Simulated Situations 73
5.4 Conclusion 76
PART II Laypersons’ encounters with emotional victims of crime 77
6. Laypersons’ ratings of emotional victims of crime 79
6.1 Study 1: Anger and sadness versus non-emotional suffering 80
6.2 Study 2: Anger versus non-emotional suffering in a VIS 89
6.3 Study 3: Anger and sadness, a matter of expectations 93
6.4 General discussion 105
7. Laypersons’ articulated thoughts about emotional victims of crime 109
7.1 Method 110
7.2 Results and discussion 119
7.3 Conclusion 131
PART III Professionals’ encounters with emotional victims of crime 133
8. Judges’ articulated thoughts about emotional victims of crime 135
8.1 Method 137
8.2 Results and discussion 139
8.3 Conclusion 155
9. Prosecutors’ articulated thoughts about emotional victims of crime 157
9.1 Method 158
9.2 Results and discussion 160
9.3 Conclusion 171
PART IV General discussion 173
10. General discussion 175
10.1 General discussion of the main findings 176
10.2 Limitations 180
10.3 Implications 182
Summary 187
References 191
APPENDICES 215
A – Vignette and manipulations study 6.1 and 6.2 217
B – Vignette and manipulations study 6.3 220
C – Dutch version of the Global Belief in a Just World scale 221
D – Dutch version of the short Justice Sensitivity scale 222
E – ATSS vignettes 223
F – Overview of participants and conditions 235
G – Original phrases from transcripts in Dutch 238
Anderen die dit boek kochten, kochten ook
Net verschenen
Rubrieken
- aanbestedingsrecht
- aansprakelijkheids- en verzekeringsrecht
- accountancy
- algemeen juridisch
- arbeidsrecht
- bank- en effectenrecht
- bestuursrecht
- bouwrecht
- burgerlijk recht en procesrecht
- europees-internationaal recht
- fiscaal recht
- gezondheidsrecht
- insolventierecht
- intellectuele eigendom en ict-recht
- management
- mens en maatschappij
- milieu- en omgevingsrecht
- notarieel recht
- ondernemingsrecht
- pensioenrecht
- personen- en familierecht
- sociale zekerheidsrecht
- staatsrecht
- strafrecht en criminologie
- vastgoed- en huurrecht
- vreemdelingenrecht